| What
Does The Future Hold For The Economy?
It was little over one year
ago that President Clinton’s letter of
May 30, 1997 to the CNMI’s
chief executive stated, “I have concluded
federal immigration, naturalization,
and minimum wage laws should now be
applied to the Commonwealth,
as provided by the Covenant.”
Many in the Northern Marianas, including legislators, the business
community, government officials
and workers have been giving a great
deal of thought to the impact
resulting from the possible loss of local
control over immigration
and the imposition of the U. S. minimum wage.
Add to the above the
eventual departure of the garment industry
believed by many to occur
within the next five years together with the
apprehension over the current
Asian economic crisis which has had dire
consequences for the tourist
sector and you have a situation of
increasing economic uncertainty.
Ponder how this will impact on the
economy and eventually effect
all businesses and government revenues.
Sometimes
I wonder if those in the U. S. Congress and other U. S.
government agencies advocating
the “take-over” action described in the
President’s letter have
given any thought to the real impact on the
future of the Commonwealth’s
economy resulting from the combined
repercussion of the above.
With few exceptions, as things now stand only
tourism and the multiplier
effect of that sector would remain - and both
could experience more decline
than we are now witnessing.
No one knows for certain when, or if, U. S. policy will be
imposed - but trying to
plan investment for the future in view of such
uncertainty can be difficult.
I suspect that those in the United States
that have worked to remove
the current wage and immigration elements of
the economy have given little
thought to the economic ramifications of
the long term transfiguration
that may occur within the business
environment.
The above measures, coming all at once, or nearly so, are severe.
Of course, some very competent
local people are hard at work to devise
programs and efforts to
stimulate the economy, but always there is that
lingering degree of uncertainty
as to the full depth of influence the
actions by the United States
Government will ultimately have on the
various alternatives that
are undertaken. Certainly outside investors
must be concerned over these
unknown factors and many must have adopted
a “wait and see” attitude
before investing in new businesses or
expanding existing enterprises
be they American or foreign owned.
Currently all businesses are experiencing a degree of uncertainty .
. . the one single factor
the business community abhors above all else.
Uncertainly erodes long
term confidence in the area. Uncertainty and the
unknown create an atmosphere
of instability.
As pointed out in another column, in 1978 it was the stability
provided by United States
law and the Commonwealth’s association with
America that provided the
principle ingredient that encouraged foreign
investor confidence in the
Northern Marianas. Today, some of these
investors must be confused
since the rules for doing business may soon
change.
I think the United States Government has an obligation to the CNMI
to first assess the impact
of any federal action that would modify the
economic forces at work
in the Commonwealth before any drastic changes
in the islands’ economic
environment are placed into effect. I am not
aware that policy makers
in the United States Government have considered
any federal program that
might mitigate the eventual adverse impact of a
federal take-over of immigration.
There seems to be little appreciation
of economic geography as
concerns the Commonwealth and its Asian
neighbors. If geopolitics
means anything it should be of interest to the
United States to maintain
a presence on the doorstep of Asia and the
Marianas archipelago is
the only place where this can be achieved and
this presence is best displayed
in a thriving, healthy economy.
Back |